Tuesday, August 19, 2014

Charter Corruption

ALL YOU EVER DID NOT WANT TO KNOW ABOUT CHARTERS 


A huge Pot of Gold had turned into a disaster for schoolchildren in Newark. Charges of racism appear at the end of Newark's Pot of Gold Rainbow. And parents and voters are learning just how little they really knew about what was going on until their neighborhood schools began closing. Hundreds of millions of dollars were involved. Here's the gist of what happened:

New Yorker article graphic
Late one night in December, 2009, a black Chevy Tahoe in a caravan of cops and residents moved slowly through some of the most dangerous neighborhoods of Newark. In the back sat the Democratic mayor, Cory Booker, and the Republican governor-elect of New Jersey, Chris Christie....

Booker had been a champion of vouchers and charter schools for Newark since he was elected to the city council, in 1998, and now he wanted to overhaul the school district. He would need Christie’s help....

...[R]eformers argued that well-run schools with the flexibility to recruit the best teachers could overcome many of the effects of poverty, broken homes, and exposure to violence. That usually meant charter schools, which operated free of the district schools’ large bureaucracies and union rules. “We know what works,” Booker and other reformers often said. They blamed vested interests for using poverty as an excuse for failure, and dismissed competing approaches as incrementalism. Education needed “transformational change.” Mark Zuckerberg, the twenty-six-year-old head of Facebook, agreed, and he pledged a hundred million dollars to Booker and Christie’s cause.

Almost four years later, Newark has fifty new principals, four new public high schools, a new teachers’ contract that ties pay to performance, and an agreement by most charter schools to serve their share of the neediest students. But residents only recently learned that the overhaul would require thousands of students to move to other schools, and a thousand teachers and more than eight hundred support staff to be laid off within three years. In mid-April, seventy-seven members of the clergy signed a letter to Christie requesting a moratorium on the plan, citing “venomous” public anger and “the moral imperative” that people have power over their own destiny. Booker, now a U.S. senator, said in a recent interview that he understood families’ fear and anger: “My mom—she would’ve been fit to be tied with some of what happened.”... [emphasis added]
Graphic from "Flipping Schools" article below
Behind New Jersey Education Reform,"
By Owen Davis, Truthout, August 2014.
Half a year after Newark Public Schools launched an "agenda to ensure all students are in excellent schools," the plan has come under a federal civil rights investigation to determine whether it "discriminates against black students."

The investigation centers on a cluster of school closings in Newark's predominantly black South Ward. Absent a consistent reason why the district targeted these schools - such as poor academics or declining enrollment - activists alleged discrimination. The "One Newark" reform plan, they wrote, would "continue a pattern of shuttering public schools in communities of color."


This investigation could illuminate the structural forces behind Newark school reforms. Though there's been ample media coverage of the city's noisy school politics - from Mark Zuckerberg's $100 million gift to this year's contentious mayoral election - so far, these structural forces remain opaque.
But an in-depth look into the district's ultimately unsuccessful attempt to close one South Ward school reveals how real estate concerns and facilities funding increasingly drive neighborhood school closings and the expansion of privately managed charter schools. By allocating millions of dollars in little-known bonds exclusively to charters while imposing austerity on public facilities, the state has quietly stacked the deck for charters, leaving neighborhood schools to molder in decline....

All told, the district's plan would impact a third of Newark's schools....
...Newark charters have become "infamous for being able to leverage their bonds to flip buildings"....
But the fact that New Jersey stoppered facilities funding while directing $300 million in bonds to charters gives the lie to the notion that charters and district schools compete on a level playing field. As dilapidated neighborhood schools importune the SDA for urgent repairs, charters watch major construction projects break ground through no-interest loans not available to schools....
It's a familiar pattern. By systematically underfunding the public sector while extending market incentives to private actors, the Christie administration has essentially placed its thumb on the scale for charters. The result: Some charters enjoy gleaming new facilities (bankrolled by the same financial milieu that spends its down time plugging them), while the public sector continues its decline. [all emphasis added]
For more information on the purpose of charter schools in New Jersey and elsewhere see my book the deliberate dumbing down of america. On pages 427-428, you can read an excerpt of article from 1998, “COMING SOON TO A SCHOOL NEAR YOU: FORCED LABOR” By Paul Mulshine, columnist for the Newark, New Jersey Star-Ledger. Mulshine warned:
Imagine a state that uses its school system not to produce independent-minded, broadly educated citizens, but compliant workers trained to behave. A state where, in their early teens, children are forced to make a lifelong decision from 14 government-sanctioned career possibilities with such depressing titles as “waste management,” “administrative services” and “manufacturing, installation and repair.” A state where students in the government schools are forced to spend one day a week toiling in menial labor.
The old Soviet Union? China?
Nope. New Jersey.
I wish I were making this up. But I’m not. This is a fair summation—minus the jargon— of the School-to-Work program that the state is planning to impose on us next year....

Monday, August 18, 2014

Parents as Customers?

Controlling the "Customer" via "Choice"
Back in 1993 the book TOTAL QUALITY FOR SCHOOLS: A SUGGESTION FOR AMERICAN EDUCATION By Joseph C. Fields was published (ASQ Quality Press: Milwaukee, Wis.). This book was given to selected local school boards in districts implementing reform/restructuring. The author divulged a completely new agenda for schools, hearkening to the rise of charter schools. 

Parents and children were referred to as the "customer" - especially in the context of private schools, vouchers and "choice." 
Educators must confront this age-old question of whom to serve and resolve this question in favor of the customer and the American culture, political system, and economic system.... (p. 19)

Schools must think in terms of futures, always 10 to 20 years ahead of today. Schools
that are constant in their purposes must change to meet customer requirements. Schools must deal with the problems of today as well as the problems of tomorrow to assure Americans that they will be in the education business of the future. As the number of private schools increases, as school vouchers and schools of choice develop, and as schools take on more and more social responsibilities, it is questionable whether or not certain schools will be in business in the future....


Businesses will not buy from uncertified vendors. This idea might contain some merit for educators. The state of Tennessee, in its original Career Ladder Program for  educators, required a portfolio of specifications, quality assurances, work standards, and process control in addition to several site visits from evaluators who were unfamiliar with the evaluated teacher. Consider too the “parent as vendor” of a precious resource, the child. In the internal customer concept, the parent is serving the teacher. Teachers could identify reasonable specifications for parents relative to the home learning environment and certify parents who will cooperate. (p. 48) [all emphases added]

The above statement is absolutely appalling! We are misled when we believe that education is a commodity or service to be “purchased” by “consumers.” This tends to make the public believe that education is market-driven. Compulsory attendance laws make education anything but market-driven! More importantly, the concept of consumer/purchaser does not correlate to our relationship to our elected officials who are legal overseers of the process. Have we lost sight of what our relationship to government is? Education is a trust, not a commodity. These are our children, and their futures; parents are not “shopping” for education, but are fervently searching for someone to whom they are willing to entrust the task of providing an academic education for their children.

As charter schools develop, the temptation will be for private industry to take a more direct role in funding and developing programs for these schools which will produce workers who can fill the corporations’ needs. These schools, then, have the potential of becoming “corporate academies” with a narrow focus and limited curriculum base. This is accomplished through the school-business partnerships growing into corporate funding to accomplish its task. As this potential reality develops, the specter of true socialism—the combining of the private and public sectors to produce goods and services—takes on discernible size and shape.



B.F. Skinner once mused that the functions of government in the future would be educational. In the above scenario we see that the reverse of that prediction can be true as well—in the future the functions of education will be governmental. Let us remember that the true purpose of education is the intrinsic enhancement of the individual. Let us not reduce education to limited learning for lifelong labor and our great country’s heritage of freedom to a footnote in history.
 

In 1998, at the Sixth Annual Model Schools Conference—sponsored by Willard Daggett, director of the International Center for Leadership in Education, a participant who is an assistant principal at a middle school in Southern California made this comment to a reporter regarding mechanisms to encourage parental involvement and support in the education of children:
 

One way to make sure that parents attend conferences at school and support the educational process for their children would be to dock a certain part of their tax deduction for their children. There could be a scale of activities in which the parents would be required to have documentation—perhaps a sign-off at the school—of participation before they would be allowed to claim their tax deductions for their children. I agree with Daggett that we may have to employ some measures that seem extreme. [all emphasis added]
Returning to a final quote from Total Quality for Schools: A Suggestion for American Education:
In all this interpretation, schools are not free. They require responsible commitment from everyone. Citizens would no more be allowed to put obstacles in the way of public educators than to interfere with public medical, police, or fire protection personnel who are doing their duty. (p. 53) [emphasis added]
Apparently under this artificial "choice" the "customer" is not always right!
This post is adapted from an entry in the deliberate dumbing down of america, pp. 305-306. Portions of the comments in this blog post came from an article by Cynthia Weatherly titled "Privatization or Socialization?" 

Saturday, August 16, 2014

How Charter Schools Are Being Marketed

Talking Points for Deceiving the Public

http://edushyster.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/07/charter-messaging-small.pdf
An amazing document is posted online that divulges how Charter Schools are being professionally marketed to grassroots Americans. The following excerpts illustrate the methods of deception. Note carefully the use of language to deceive.

Here are the talking points from page 8. Notice how this is trying to disguise that Charters are for-profit business corporations by referring to them as "schools." An alarming talking point warns not to use the word "experiments" or "experimentation" (!!!) regarding children in these schools, but rather refer to it as "Responsive to student needs" or "Innovation." And Charter "operators" are supposed to be referred to merely as "school leaders. "

Page 5 divulges a list of language and terminology that should be avoided when discussing Charter schools because it is "Language That Can Produce A Negative Reaction." This is how the politicians, legislators, the media, and the public are all being deceived. So Charter marketers and operators are being warned to avoid any perceived attacks on public education, and to avoid gloating when public schools "don't perform well." 

Charter promoters are also to do everything they can to avoid mentioning that Charters are "Partnerships with Business and Foundations" -- in other words, cover up the for-profit motives of Charter corporate sponsors. It isn't said here below, but it can be assumed that Charter marketers are also told to refrain from mentioning how they profit from monies siphoned off from the public school budgets, thus harming local school districts.

From page 3, we learn the horrifying truth about this marketing deception: "when we use words that work, people like what they hear--and that means more support for charter schools."
Note that the definition of Charter Schools above cleverly and deceptively defines Charters by using  all of the "correct "Say This" terminology that is recommended on page 5.

FIRST CLASS BULLY TACTICS


Controversial "Rocketship" Targets Tennessee Public Schools

By Mary Thompson, 3D Research Group
Hello, Tennessee taxpayers!

The following was  in today's San Jose Mercury News. Thought you might like to see what the reporters here are writing about Rocketship Charter Schools concentrating on Tennessee. Rocketship has been in the news here in recent  years with one controversial move after  another. Rocketship's modus operandi is "first class bully tactics." I wrote about Rocketship Schools in an earlier blog post: "Back to Earth for One Charter School"



Here's the latest update from the San Jose Mercury News. 08/10/2014, Page B03, Internal Affairs:


"ROCKETSHIP TAKES OFF IN TENNESSEE, BUT NOT IN TEXAS"
Rocketship Education is celebrating its first school in the South: Rocketship Nashville Northeast Elementary, its second outside California. The Redwood City-based charter school operator crowed that the first day of school two weeks ago represented "the opening salvo in our effort to rethink education from the ground up in the Volunteer State....

What Rocketship hasn't broadcast is its last-minute withdrawal from Texas, where it was considered on track to open 16 schools in San Antonio and Dallas. It had the enthusiastic backing of moneyed charter boosters, had sailed past a state review committee and had even hired high-profile staff....

...IA wonders whether the backpedaling could be related to falling tests scores in 2013, after a failed experiment in knocking down classroom walls and ballooning class sizes to 100 students. Or that a Rocketship school in Milwaukee, its first outside California, went under-enrolled last year....

Kuizenga said Rocketship will continue to expand and that when it looks beyond its three regions and Washington, D.C. -- where a school is slated to open next year -- "Texas is on the shortlist." [all emphasis added]


For more information read the previous blog post: "WAIVERS for FAVORS"

"WAIVERS for FAVORS"

Charter Schools Spiff Up Their Image, 
Hire Professional Marketers



Controversies about Charter Schools and their less-than-stellar operators are heating up all across the country. Below is just one story that came out this past week. Read it and weep. Remember - it is children who are being adversely affected by this greedy madness, and it is tax-paying citizens who are losing local control. 

"Embroiled charter school company hires publicity firm," By Doug Livingston, Akron Beacon Journal, August 9, 2014.
Chicago-based charter school company Concept Schools, under investigation in several states, has hired a longtime Ohio political operative as its spokesman....

The move to hire Weaver, a Republican political consultant and campaign adviser to former Ohio Attorney General and State Auditor Betty Montgomery, follows two months of stories by a number of newspapers.

In recent years, Weaver has worked for the campaigns of Republican Ohio Supreme Court Justice Robert Cupp and presidential candidate Mitt Romney and has been a spokesman for gambling interests and electric utilities. About a dozen years ago, he helped with a political action committee backing Supreme Court justices who would hear charter school cases. The PAC was headed by charter-school operator David Brennan of White Hat Management.


In June the FBI obtained records from three Concept Schools regional offices in Ohio, probing what it called a “white-collar crime matter” involving federal education grants. [all emphasis added]
Keep in mind that charter schools were set up across the country on the principle of "waivers for favors." In exchange for granting "waivers" that permit most charters to operate far outside any state or local scrutiny or control over their entire operations, legislators and other elected officials have received "favors" (campaign donations, etc.). In other words, most states turn a blind eye on charter schools, who operate under very few regulations, even at the expense of student safety. Horror stories have abounded.
Here is a run-down of the horror stories recorded in just this one article:
  • In July, four former teachers at Horizon Science Academy Dayton, a charter school managed by Concept Schools, told the state school board that Turkish administrators had altered student tests, 
  • mistreated minority students and female staff, 
  • witnessed and ignored sexual activity and 
  • tweaked attendance records.
  • A week later, the Dayton Daily News quoted a former Horizon student who said Turkish administrators paid him $20 an hour to manipulate hundreds of tests taken by other students. [bullet points and all emphasis added]
For background information about Charter Schools and how they got started, their sleazy operators, the horror stories, and how they built their profitable financial empire in Ohio on the backs of taxpayers and schoolchildren, read "The Choice Charade" article series posted at: http://www.deliberatedumbingdown.com/pages/articles/choice1.html

Friday, August 15, 2014

A Vanishing Species of Superintendents

Heroic Superintendents 1975, 1986 and 2014!  

Refreshing Stands Past and Present

2014: Iberville, Louisiana superintendent takes a stand against charter schools, based on what it will do to destroy citizen rights and how tax money will end up in private for-profit corporate coffers. Two articles report what is going on. Note what is highlighted:
PLAQUEMINE — The construction of what is expected to become the first charter school in Iberville Parish has the parish’s school superintendent on edge and voicing concerns about what he sees as a potential threat to the public school system.

“It’s an intrusion on our local rights and tax money,” Superintendent Ed Cancienne said Wednesday about the construction of Iberville Charter Academy....



Shortly before Tuesday’s information session started, Cancienne sent out a letter to parish residents that he said was to clear up any confusion that the new school was affiliated in any way with the Iberville Parish school system....


Once opened, money for the school’s operations will come from the state’s Minimum Foundation Program which annually allots a certain amount of money to local schools on a per child basis.

That is money that would otherwise go to the public school district if students remained enrolled in its schools.
According to the school’s website, the curriculum at Iberville Charter Academy will be aligned with Common Core Standards geared toward college readiness.

PLAQUEMINE — The Iberville Parish School Board decided Monday it would fight to retain more than $3.8 million in state funding by suing the state Board of Elementary and Secondary Education.
The school district is seeking an injunction to stop BESE from funneling the state Minimum Foundation Program funding to a new charter school, which opened on Monday, until the matter can be heard in court.

The board made the decision during its regular meeting Monday night at the recommendation of Superintendent Ed Cancienne, who previously called the opening of the Iberville Charter Academy “an intrusion on the school district’s rights and tax money.”
This parish shouldn’t have to suffer; to take our local dollars to support a private business and make a profit off of our kids in this parish, it’s not right,” board member Brian Willis said before voting Monday.

What we’ve seen in Louisiana … is a great proliferation of charter schools based on a for-profit model that are locating in districts that have high per-pupil allocations, especially the local share of revenue raised in the Minimum Foundation Program,” Richard said to the board.
1986: ON MAY 5, 1986 THE ST. LOUIS GLOBE-DEMOCRAT RAN AN ARTICLE ENTITLED “SCHOOL Officials Upset by New State Plan” which reported that local educators objected vociferously to a new state plan that required them to give standardized tests in seven core subjects to students in the third, sixth, eighth, and tenth grades. Excerpts from this article follow:
Local educators are stepping up their criticism of what they claim is state interference in the way local schools teach children.... The tests are required by the Excellence in Education Act of 1985, a reform bill that educators have largely supported. But school officials claim the testing component will force them to change their curriculum so students learn material in the same order the tests are given [teach to the test]. They claim 70 to 80 percent of the curriculum in local schools could be determined by the new tests....

“We are not opposed to the concept of teaching children the fundamental facts that they ought to know. The issue is who controls the curriculum,” said Kirkwood School District Superintendent Thomas Keating. Keating and other superintendents aired their complaints at a joint meeting last week of the Cooperating School Districts of the St. Louis Suburban Area and the Missouri School Boards Association....
…One of the harshest critics of the test plan is Ferguson-Florissant Superintendent Daniel B. Keck, who said the districts may just as well replace their school names with “Department of Elementary and Secondary Education, State of Missouri, Local Annex.”...
Keck, however, said the state has bypassed elected school board members and established a direct “pipeline” to local schools. He said administrators are accountable to whoever sets the curriculum.... “To whom am I as the chief executive officer of a school district responsible: to you, or DESE?” Keck said. “In this particular system, there are no checks and balances. That is bad governance.” He said the media will create public pressure to excel on the new tests.... [Emphasis added. Continue reading this story in the deliberate dumbing down of america, p. 234.]
1975: SUPERINTENDENT RAY I. POWELL, PH.D., OF SOUTH ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA PUBLIC SCHOOLS spoke out regarding values clarification and sensitivity training in 1975, saying, “It’s all brainwashing!” Excerpts follow from a memorandum to “All Administrators from Ray I. Powell” concerning Center Bulletin No. 39: 1974–1975, dated February 26, 1975:
1. Parents have the prime responsibility for the inculcation of those moral and spiritual values desired for their children in the areas of abortion and birth control. Indeed, this is an inherent right of parents and must not be denied....
Effective immediately, the teaching, advising, directing, suggesting, or counseling of students in these two (2) areas cannot be/shall not be the responsibility nor the task of the South St. Paul Public Schools.
Rather, the efforts of the public schools, henceforth, shall be directed towards expanding those complimentary learning experiences in other areas of the total curriculum that will enhance these two (2) parental values, i.e.:
  • preservation of the family unit.
  • feminine role of the wife, mother, and homemaker.
  • masculine role of guide, protector, and provider.
  • advocacy of home and family values.
  • respect for family structure and authority.
  • enhancement of womanhood and femininity.
  • restoration of morality.
2. There are more and more concerns and questions being registered today regarding the questionable results and the true intent of SENSITIVITY TRAINING, as well as its germaneness to the goals and objectives of public education, the training of educators, and the learning experiences of students.
Consider these two (2) definitions of SENSITIVITY TRAINING (sources furnished upon
request):
Sensitivity training is defined as group meetings, large or small, to discuss publicly intimate and personal matters, and opinions, values or beliefs; and/or to act out emotions and feelings toward one another in the group, using the techniques of self-confession and mutual criticism.
It is also “coercive persuasion in the form of thought reform or brainwashing.”
Is the prime concern in education today not to impart knowledge, but to change “attitudes,” so that children can/will willingly accept a controlled society? Are the public schools being unwittingly re-shaped to accomplish this and without realizing it?
[Emphasis added. Continue reading this story in the deliberate dumbing down of america, p. 131-132]

Politically Correct Dumbing Down

How Absurd it Gets. . . 

Be sure to read the following article by Stephanie Block:

"Government funded re-education of educators on so-called 'White Privilege'"

Below are some key excerpts:

A fascinating discussion of racism, as a long-standing institution of “systemic, race-based privilege in America,” has been conducted for the past 15 years in education circles at an annual event called the White Privilege Conference (WPC)....

What do these students and educators learn?

White privilege theory – as presented in a Progressives Today undercover video about the 2014 conference – argues that “white racism is institutional, structural and pervades all aspects of American society… it is the deliberate invention of capitalists who goal is to keep labor divided along racial lines.”

Berkley Law Professor, John A. Powell, argued in his keynote address[v] that “modern capitalism is the consequence of flawed concepts dating to the Age of Enlightenment – concepts such as individual rights, reason, logic, and the scientific method.  He rejects these ideas as white constructs and impediments to a better society.”....


How does white privilege theory trickle down into the classroom, particularly with young children?

In Rosemary Colt and Diana Reeves’ workshop,  fellow teachers were encouraged to find opportunities to “insert social justice, anti-racist  information for even little kids to understand” in their lesson plans.  They show worksheets that they give their students.  One question asks whether the Constitution “works equally well for everyone.”  “No,” one student answers as he’s been taught, “because some people have different beliefs” ....

Stephanie Block is the author of the four-volume 'Change Agents: Alinskyian Organizing Among Religious Bodies', available at Amazon.