#NO WAY ESEA #NO WAY ESEA #NO WAY ESEA
(Brainwashing 101: from 1941 to 1948 to 2015)
1941 "An observer, seeing that the largest poster in sight bears the letters U.S.S.R., might
think that this is a picture of a school room in Russia. It is a picture of a room in a public
school in Philadelphia."
Excerpt from the deliberate dumbing down of america 3D, pages 30-33:
Education for Destruction: An Eyewitness Account by Dr. B.R. Burchett, former Head of Department of Latin in the Philadelphia public school system.
The advertising brochure for Dr. Burchett's book reads as follows:
NOW for the First Time—the AMAZING STORY OF COMMUNISTS’ INIQUITOUS
CORRUPTION OF AMERICA’S SCHOOL CHILDREN
HOW does the small Sovieteer minority control loyal teachers in our schools and colleges?
HOW are anti-American, anti-religious, anti-Christ textbooks forced upon teachers and students?
WHY are Washington and Jefferson ridiculed, while Marx and Lenin are canonized in the schools?
WHY are boys and girls of 13 taught free love, sexual promiscuity, and other degrading subjects?
WHAT’S GOING ON IN OUR AMERICAN SCHOOLS ANYWAY?
The answers to these and other dismaying questions are all found
in Education for Destruction: An Eyewitness Account by Dr. B.R. Burchett, former Head of Department of Latin in the Philadelphia public school system. It is a fearless and devastating exposé of Communism in America’s schools, its concealed objectives, hidden motives, serpent-like power, and its vicious demoralization of children and adolescents. EVERY parent... EVERY educator...EVERY clergyman should read this book! [emphasis in original]
in Education for Destruction: An Eyewitness Account by Dr. B.R. Burchett, former Head of Department of Latin in the Philadelphia public school system. It is a fearless and devastating exposé of Communism in America’s schools, its concealed objectives, hidden motives, serpent-like power, and its vicious demoralization of children and adolescents. EVERY parent... EVERY educator...EVERY clergyman should read this book! [emphasis in original]
Dr. Burchett has included, opposite the title page of her book, a photograph of one of the
classrooms in the school in which she taught. Under the photo are the words “No communism in the public schools?” accompanied by the following comments:
classrooms in the school in which she taught. Under the photo are the words “No communism in the public schools?” accompanied by the following comments:
"An observer, seeing that the largest poster in sight bears the letters U.S.S.R., might
think that this is a picture of a school room in Russia. It is a picture of a room in a public
school in Philadelphia. Did Superintendent Broome know about this? Did the Board of
Education know about it? The picture is taken from Dr. Broome’s Annual Report to the Board of Education, for the year ended June 30, 1936...."
think that this is a picture of a school room in Russia. It is a picture of a room in a public
school in Philadelphia. Did Superintendent Broome know about this? Did the Board of
Education know about it? The picture is taken from Dr. Broome’s Annual Report to the Board of Education, for the year ended June 30, 1936...."
Education for Destruction : An Eyewitness Account
is available as a FREE DOWNLOAD at AmericanDeception.com
1948 COLLEGE POLL SHOWS 63 PERCENT FAVOR SOCIALISM
Excerpt from Education for the New Social Order...
Tragic Results Now Apparent, by Augustus G. Rudd, Chairman, Guardians of American Foundation (delivered before the National Society of New England Women, New York, N.Y., February 26,1948)
STUDENTS LOSE FAITH IN AMERICAN WAY
At a delightful garden party near the banks of the Hudson River, there were present several students from a nearby women's college, two of whom I engaged in conversation . Although these young ladies were born and bred in the finest American tradition, I was amazed to hear their opinions on
economic and political philosophy. Both held that our American free economy was outmoded, that the profit motive was bad, and that socialism would be an improvement . Both were
lukewarm about the value of the Constitution of the United States; saying that it had outlived its usefulness in many respects and now retarded democracy. One said that communism
was a modern form of democracy from which we could adopt many desirable features. In short, these college girls had little or no faith or belief in our American system regardless of its glorious record of material and spiritual blessings, the envy of oppressed peoples all over the world.
economic and political philosophy. Both held that our American free economy was outmoded, that the profit motive was bad, and that socialism would be an improvement . Both were
lukewarm about the value of the Constitution of the United States; saying that it had outlived its usefulness in many respects and now retarded democracy. One said that communism
was a modern form of democracy from which we could adopt many desirable features. In short, these college girls had little or no faith or belief in our American system regardless of its glorious record of material and spiritual blessings, the envy of oppressed peoples all over the world.
COLLEGE POLL SHOWS 63 PERCENT FAVOR SOCIALISM
No doubt all of you have had similar experiences, for this leading girls college is not unique . It could be any of about two-thirds of our colleges, for men or women, North, South,
East, or West ; for a carefully conducted survey recently revealed that nearly two-thirds of our college students favored socialism. Dr. Henry Link posed the following question to a cross section of 5,000 people : "If the Government owned and managed industries, would you get more or less
for your money than you do now?" Among the general population, 43 percent said that they would get as much' or more under Government ownership, and 63 percent of the college students polled were of this opinion . Bewildered parents all over the country have been asking
themselves in recent years, "How do these youngsters get that way?" Time and again I have heard a distressed parent say, "Jim certainly didn't get it at home ." Or, "Jane was all right before she went to college ." So, what is the answer? Is there a pattern or plan behind a widespread movement?
Unfortunately, this condition has been brought about largely by design. Briefly, this is the story:
DEBUNKING THE FOUNDING FATHERS
Thirty-five years ago, Charles A . Beard, then a young professor at Columbia University, wrote a book called An Economic Interpretation of the Constitution of the United
States, in which he questioned the motives and the work of the founding fathers of this Republic. This book may properly be considered the primary course of the "debunkers"
of American history. It advanced the theory of "economic determinism," meaning that any man's motives are dominated by, his present or expected wealth, and therefore his actions
must be judged solely in this light . Since most of the signers of the Constitution were men of some wealth (quite naturally, since they were educated and education was rare and expensive in those days) it follows, according to the book, that their impelling motives for creating this great charter of freedom were not necessarily for the good of the whole people but rather for the delegates' own personal interest . In his 1913 book Beard states : "Suppose * * * that substantially all of the merchants, money lenders, security holders, manufacturers, shippers, capitalists, and financiers and their professional associates are to be found on one side in support of the Constitution and that substantially all or the major portion of the opposition came from the non-slave holding farmers and the debtors-would it not be pretty conclusively demonstrated that our fundamental law was not the product of an abstraction known as `the whole people,' but of a group of economic interests which must have expected beneficial results from its adoption?"...
States, in which he questioned the motives and the work of the founding fathers of this Republic. This book may properly be considered the primary course of the "debunkers"
of American history. It advanced the theory of "economic determinism," meaning that any man's motives are dominated by, his present or expected wealth, and therefore his actions
must be judged solely in this light . Since most of the signers of the Constitution were men of some wealth (quite naturally, since they were educated and education was rare and expensive in those days) it follows, according to the book, that their impelling motives for creating this great charter of freedom were not necessarily for the good of the whole people but rather for the delegates' own personal interest . In his 1913 book Beard states : "Suppose * * * that substantially all of the merchants, money lenders, security holders, manufacturers, shippers, capitalists, and financiers and their professional associates are to be found on one side in support of the Constitution and that substantially all or the major portion of the opposition came from the non-slave holding farmers and the debtors-would it not be pretty conclusively demonstrated that our fundamental law was not the product of an abstraction known as `the whole people,' but of a group of economic interests which must have expected beneficial results from its adoption?"...
2015 Carnegie Corporation's Communist Core
The abcsofdumbdown.blogspot.com and/or the deliberate dumbing down
of america (FREE download at http://www.deliberatedumbingdown.com)
contain additional verbatim quotes for research on this subject.