Monday, October 26, 2015

The Day America Died- Nov. 21,1985


Thanks President Reagan and Heritage Foundation for the General Agreement between the United States of America and the Government of the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics on Contacts, Exchanges and Cooperation in Scientific, Technical, Educational, Cultural and Other Fields, which have resulted in not only the merger of the KGB and the FBI (see video), but all the following treasonous activities taking place since 1985.


"Ambassador Malcolm Toon, a career foreign service officer and former American Ambassador to the Soviet Union under President Carter, said in a speech at the Hotchkiss School on November 1, 1985, "We must recognize the Soviet Union for what it is a ruthless and brutal power...its leadership is conspiratorial in nature and its foreign policy inherently aggressive...The Soviets will extend and consolidate their power wherever they think they can do with impunity."     (Emphasis added)


"the deliberate dumbing down of america, 1999, (now out of print but available as a free download at, and the 2011 updated/abridged version available at have been similarly boycotted by Eagle Forum and other neoconservative organizations, spearheaded this time by the Heritage Foundation, Washington, D.C., and all its state affiliates. Heritage Foundation's boycott made sense since the deliberate dumbing down of america had exposed the Heritage-supported President Reagan-USSR President Gorbachev Education Agreement, 1985, which merged the two education systems, AND the fact that Heritage Foundation's Richard Allen, formerly a top aide in the Reagan White House, had drafted the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) which was the forerunner to the TPP (TransPacific Partnership) both of which require the education restructuring to global workforce training being implemented as I write."

Global Tyranny By Conservative Pied Pipers?

Read every single word in the following article. Even I am shocked, and I wrote it!


"Among Louis Freeh's supposedly commendable achievements as FBI director, according to Robert S. Bennett, (brother of William Bennett, former Secretary of Education, ed) was the realization of his vision of a 'global FBI.' It was in pursuit of that vision that Freeh traveled to Moscow in 1994, and--on the fourth of July--signed a agreement creating a framework for FBI/KGB collaboration. 'We can honestly say that our two nations have more in common than ever before,' declared Freeh at the ceremony, which took place after a tour of the KGB's Lubyanka Square headquarters. 'We are united in purpose and in spirit.'"         

"4. The Republican Party invited former Soviet President Gorbachev to be the keynote speaker at a dinner to raise money for Republican candidates."

"5. Our government turned over the nation's number one military installation, The Presidio, in San Francisco, California to former Soviet President Gorbachev for his New Age environmental/ecological activities."         

 "Putin, the ex-KGB boss, concurred. 'Together, we will counteract global threats and challenges,' Putin said. 'We're going to form a stable world order in the interests of our peoples and our countries.' Dubbed the Treaty of Moscow, the new pact commits Russia and the U.S. to reduce their strategic nuclear arsenals to 2,200 warheads each by December 31, 2002. In addition to the treaty, Bush and Putin signed an eight-page agreement pledging U.S.-Russian cooperation on economic matters, the Middle East peace process, nuclear proliferation and missile defense, and the war against terrorism.'" 

Sunday, October 25, 2015

Global Tyranny By Conservative Pied Pipers?

Image by:


Global Post #2

Privatizers such as Eagle Forum and Heritage Foundation have controlled the pro-family education movement promoting Vouchers and Choice in the United States since the 1970s.

Is it too late to expose these neoconservative organizations for their role in the transformation of education from academics to Skinnerian behavior modification, mainly through their boycotting of all information regarding the dangers to mind, soul, and upward mobility of our children, in order to spin off profits for the global elite and for a global tyranny?

Is it baffling that organizations which call themselves "conservative" promote both Privatization and Skinnerian Methods? For instance:

"Joseph Bast, president of Heartland Institute, stated in 1997,‘Like most other conservatives and libertarians, we see vouchers as a major step toward the complete privatization of schooling. In fact, after careful study, we have come to the conclusion that they are the only way to dismantle the current socialist regime.’ Bast added, "’Government schools will diminish in enrollment and thus in number as parents shift their loyalty and vouchers to superior-performing private schools.’"

What should be a wake-up call to all true conservatives is the fact that the neoconservative Heartland Institute recently released Rewards, a book written by Heartland President Joseph Bast and Professor Herbert Walberg. Rewards promotes the Skinnerian operant conditioning method. Walberg, an internationally recognized behavioral psychologist who has worked closely with noted federally-funded education change agents (Goodlad, Sizer, Raywid, et al) on U.S. Dept. of Education grants, has also written for the ultimate Transformer of children, UNESCO, and has endorsed the Skinnerian/Bloom control method of Mastery Learning/Direct Instruction.

Could it be that the Religious Right find such mind-control techniques useful in creating their own version of a one-world global order? Could members of these organizations think that such techniques might be justified in order to bring about a one-world theocratic or bible-based order?

"Many of the free-market think tanks are secular, but there is a trend toward merging free-market fundamentalism with right-wing religious ideology. The Acton Institute is described by religious historian Randall Balmer as an example of the merging of corporate interests with advocates of "dominion theology." Dominionism is the belief that Christians must take control over societal and government institutions. The Acton Institute funds events featuring dominionist leaders including Gary North, who claims that the bible mandates free market capitalism or ‘Biblical Capitalism.’ "

On September 30-Oct. 2, 1985 the corporate privatizers and the Religious Right got together in Wichita, Kansas for a conference entitled "International Conference on Family Choice and Educational Vouchers". file:///C:/Users/progressive/Downloads/Reagan-Family_Choice-Vouchers-1985-2pgs-EDU.sml.pdf

The dignitaries included Phyllis Schlafly, Milton Friedman, James Dobson, William Bennett, Tim LaHaye, and T. Boone Pickens. Wichita is, of course, the home town of the major privatizers (Koch and Garvey families). It was Garvey who called for the end of our representative government.

Did this conference represent a merger between the privatizers and the "Religious Right" under the influence of the Dominionists, who believe that the world must be converted before Jesus can return?

If so, it would be appealing to consider Total Quality Management via Bloom and Skinner as an effective system for forcing a biblical conversion of the world. For the privatizers, of course, it spells profits.

This merger, which manifested itself at Wichita, was probably nurtured by the Council for National Policy (CNP), established in 1981, where the social conservatives and non-social conservatives merged to continue their operations.

"A significant forum that brings together free-market power brokers and Religious Right leaders is the Council for National Policy (CNP), a secretive group that has met several times annually behind closed doors since 1981. Richard DeVos described CNP as bringing together the "donors and the doers." This partnership gives the Religious Right access to major funders, including Richard Mellon Scaife, who are not social conservatives."

It should come as no surprise, that CNP was founded by Tim LaHaye, and early members included Phyllis Schlafly, Richard Viguerie, Pat Robertson, Jerry Falwell, J. Peter Grace, John Ashcroft, Oliver North, etc. Read the rest here:

For those of you who are disillusioned by Ted Cruz’s support of S.306, which puts home schooling in danger of the control of the government, consider the following:

"It looks like Ted Cruz easily won over the Religious Right activists who gathered for the secretive Council for National Policy vetting session."

Is it any surprise that Cruz supports "Choice"?

And why, along with Ted Cruz, is Republican Mike Crapo a co-sponsor of S.306 bill, introduced by Utah’s Republican Mike Lee?

How many other conservative legislators are vetted by the CNP?
What is the position of the Home School Legal Defense Association (HSLDA) regarding Reconstructionism (Dominionism)? An article by Mary McCarthy entitled Reconstruction and Home Education is essential reading to understand how the Religious Right, the CNP, and the Dominionists overlap. McCarthy quotes William Martin with regard to the following:

"Other noted Reconstructionists include Greg Bahnson, David Barton of WallBuilders, Inc., David Chilton, Gary DeMar of American Vision and Worldview Magazine; Ted DeMoss of Christian Business Men's Committee; Kenneth Gentry, Jay Grimstead of Coalition on Revival; James Kennedy of Coral Ridge Presbyterian Church; *Tim LaHaye* (Left Behind) of American Coalition for Traditional Values; [It is important to note that LaHaye, who is named as a Dominionist, is the founder of the CNP. Ed.] Mrs. Connie Marshner of Free Congress Foundation; Rev Joseph Morecraft; Gary North of Institute for Christian Economics; Mark Siljander of Global Strategies, Inc.; Randall Terry of Operation Rescue and Rev. Donald Wildmon of American Family Association. Dr. Kennedy, Rev. LaHaye, Mrs. Marshner, Mr. North, R.J. Rushdoony, and Rev. Wildmon are all members of the Council For National Policy."

McCarthy continues:

"In his excellent 1996 book, With God on Our Side, William Martin used a sampling of the views of several noted Reconstructionists to give a sense of how a Reconstructed America would be: "The federal government would play no role in regulating business, public education, or welfare…[S]ome government would be visible at the level of counties…but citizens would be answerable to church authorities on most matters subject to regulation…income taxes would not exceed ten percent - the biblical tithe - and social security would disappear…[P]ublic schools would be abolished in favor of home-schooling arrangements, and families would operate on a strict patriarchal pattern. The only people permitted to vote would be members of 'biblically correct' churches. Most notably, a theonomic order would make homosexuality, adultery, blasphemy, propagation of false doctrine, and incorrigible behavior by disobedient children subject to the death penalty, preferably administered by stoning…a reconstructed America would have little room for Jews, Buddhists, Muslims, Hindus, atheists, or even non-Reconstructionist Christians. 'The Christian', one Reconstructionist author has asserted, 'must realize that pluralism is a myth…R.J. Rushdoony, also regards pluralism as a heresy, since, in the name of toleration, the believer is asked to associate on a common level of total acceptance with the atheist, the pervert, the criminal, and the adherents of other religions."

Is it just a pipe dream to hope that all members of the Eagle Forum, Concerned Women of America, and other good Americans who have similarly been betrayed by neoconservative organizations, specifically in regard to education, switch their allegiance and take a brave stand and disassociate themselves from the neoconservative movement's education agenda which includes global workforce training and tax-funded school choice/charters with unelected boards (taxation without representation)?

 Please take a look at how good Americans were taken to the cleaners on education, thanks to Phyllis Schlafly, Beverly LaHaye, Secretary William Bennett, Heritage Foundation, and other neoconservative groups who refused to allow the truth regarding the education restructuring plan to get to the American people and especially to parents!

I gave a very short speech at Eagle Forum Conference in Washington, 1984, at the time my book Back to Basics...OBE...Skinnerian International Curriculum had come off the press. U.S. Secretary of Education William Bennett attended that conference. I gave him a copy. Road_To_Mind_Control_Iserbyt-1984-1pg-EDU.sml.pdf

 Following that speech (a copy of which was handed out to all in the audience) Back to Basics Reform... was boycotted, starting with Phyllis Schlafly of Eagle Forum who told me "nobody will understand it". We were later told by some of her leading Eagles that I should rewrite it. I understand that a butcher in Georgia who had read it said "I understand that book just fine." Beverly LeHaye of Concerned Women of America, after inviting me to speak at a CWA conference in New Jersey in the 1980s, would not let me sell Back to Basics at a conference held in New Jersey! (Back to Basics Reform...or... OBE...Skinnerian International Curriculum is available as a pdf at 

the deliberate dumbing down of america, 1999, (now out of print but available as a free download at, and the 2011 updated/abridged version available at have been similarly boycotted by Eagle Forum and other neoconservative organizations, spearheaded this time by the Heritage Foundation, Washington, D.C., and all its state affiliates. Heritage Foundation's boycott made sense since the deliberate dumbing down of america had exposed the Heritage-supported President Reagan-USSR President Gorbachev Education Agreement, 1985, which merged the two education systems, AND the fact that Heritage Foundation's Richard Allen, formerly a top aide in the Reagan White House, had drafted the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) which was the forerunner to the TPP (TransPacific Partnership) both of which require the education restructuring to global workforce training being implemented as I write.

Communist Core and all curriculum, data collection, assessment, measurement, and brainwashing being implemented under education restructuring require the mind, the conscience, and soul-destroying Skinnerian method and Marxist critical thinking exposed in Back to Basics Reform...or... OBE...Skinnerian International Curriculum. 

I am writing this article in the hope that Americans will, at this very late date, disassociate themselves from the neoconservative wolves in sheep's clothing communist/globalist agenda and will jump on a "save America bandwagon". Americans MUST understand how they have been deceived due to the boycott by the conservative movement of "Back to Basics Reform or OBE... Skinnerian International Curriculum...necessary for United States participation in a socialist one world government scheduled for the early years of the 21st century", 1984, and of the deliberate dumbing down of america, boycotts that resulted in the education catastrophe prevalent today: the switch from academic education to Skinnerian/Pavlovian/Marxist performance-based behavior modification for school to work training for implementation of the global economy (communist world government). Back to Basics Reform and the deliberate dumbing down of america could have been in the hands of American parents and elected officials and could have had a huge impact in stopping the mind control freight train which is about to reach its destination through Communist Core, Soviet workforce training and brainwashing for creation of the Global Citizen, aka The New Soviet Man.

Here are a few reminders for any "Religious Right" conservatives who wish to bring about a "perfect" millennial global society through atheistic Skinnerian/Bloom techniques and "free market" Skinnerian controlled global charter schools:

1. God gave us a conscience and free will. To use mind-control brainwashing on children is pure evil.

2. There will be no Utopian Christian global order or Age of the Spirit with Jesus ruling on an earthly throne. When Jesus comes again it will be for the final judgment.

"The Son of Man in His day will be like the lightening that flashes from one end of the sky to the other" (Lk 17:24) St. Peter predicts, "The day of the Lord will come like a thief and on that day the heavens will vanish with a roar; the elements will be destroyed by fire and the earth and all its deeds will be made manifest" (2 Pt 3:10)...At this time, the final, or general judgment will occur...We do not know when the Second Coming will occur. Jesus said, "As to the exact day or hour, no one knows it, neither the angels in heaven nor even the Son, but only the Father. Be constantly on the watch! Stay awake! You do not know when the appointed time will come" (Mk 13:32-33). 


                                                    image by:


Related links:

 The Rise Of The Education Transformers


Going Round the Farris Wheel

Farris's Ferris Wheel...

History of the "Farris" Wheel


Red Alert Red Alert Red Alert #14 TREASON

Sunday, October 18, 2015

Urgent Action Alert TPP

DANGER: The TPP is an Assault on our National Sovereignty

Global Post #1

Read below for important letter from Sue Long for the Committee for Constitutional Government.




Marcus Tullius Cicero :


TPP Threatens American Jobs and Freedoms | American Jobs ...:

"TPP: UN and World Bank Tribunals Replace U.S. Courts"
"TPP says U.S. Must Submit to Foreign Tribunals"

"TPP Gives Foreign Firms Greater Rights than the U.S. Constitution gives U.S. Citizens and Businesses"
"TPP Cedes a Quarter of all U.S. Land to Foreign Control" 

Leaked TPP Document Reveals Plan To Create Corporate World Court ...:

“The Investment Chapter highlights the intent of the TPP negotiating parties, led by the United States, to increase the power of global corporations by creating a supra-national court, or tribunal, where foreign firms can “sue” states and obtain taxpayer compensation for “expected future profits”.

The Trans-Pacific Partnership clause everyone should oppose - The ...:

“Investor-State Dispute Settlement,” or ISDS. The name may sound mild, but don’t be fooled. Agreeing to ISDS in this enormous new treaty would tilt the playing field in the United States further in favor of big multinational corporations. Worse, it would undermine U.S. sovereignty.
ISDS would allow foreign companies to challenge U.S. laws — and potentially to pick up huge payouts from taxpayers — without ever stepping foot in a U.S. court...."


Dear Fellow Patriot,

The TPP is an Assault on our National Sovereignty

The Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) is a proposal of merging America with eleven Pacific Rim nations.  Its terms have been finalized by Obama and the other nations involved and is now awaiting Congressional approval.  It is to be voted on by both the House and the Senate.  

But, wait a minute!  A treaty requires a two-thirds vote of the Senate.  Sure, but Obama couldn’t get that many votes, so he called it a Partnership, and a complacent Congress went along. Then, Congress voted for Fast Track, which facilitates the final vote, making it much easier for it to get passed.  It will be voted on without a filibuster or discussion, just a straight up or down vote with only a simple majority.

The gist of TPP is that it would bind our country into a regional government that would be the governing body of America, taking precedence over our Constitution.  We would be ruled by its dictates and no longer would we have the protection of our God-given rights that our Constitution provides.

Sound preposterous?  That is what happened in Europe.  What has become the European Union (EU) was sold in 1952 to the European nations as a simple trade agreement, the European Coal and Steel Community (ECSC), as being something good for jobs and their economy.  The ECSC has morphed into the EU, the supranational entity that rules the former independent European nations.  They are no longer free countries.

Not only has the EU dictated economic matters, new EU regulations hinder the use of healthy alternative health care options by banning thousands of nutritional supplements and herbal remedies, greatly reducing their availability.   Thus is the pattern of these mergers.

Here, TPP is being hyped as a trade pact.  A free trade pact could be done in one page.  Do we need another trade pact?  We have already started down that road by signing on to NAFTA (North American Free Trade Agreement).   Where has that taken us?  How often are we frustrated by calling a company only to find ourselves trying to decipher what we are being told by someone who is unable to communicate with proper English? How many people have lost their jobs to someone overseas? These are the result of NAFTA – a free trade agreement.   Why would we want any more such partnerships?

And, furthermore, TPP has about five pages on trade out of a total of about a couple thousand pages. Other considerations by the eleven nations of the TPP have been:  immigration, climate change, sustainable development, homeland security, the military, and international courts. The terms were debated and a final version was agreed upon, but who knows what is in it?   The document is being kept secret from the public. Even the legislators who will be voting on it have been hampered. Before the Fast Track vote, they were allowed to see the then-version only by going to the White House basement where they were given a few pages at a time.
They were not allowed to take any recording devices or take notes.   And, they were forbidden from telling any private citizen what they read. Does that sound like something we would be eager to have?

Political pundits have said that Obama has pushed far more for this than he has for any other piece of legislation.  You can be sure he would not be doing that for a simple trade bill, nor would he keep the terms secret.

The labor unions, Hillary Clinton, and Bernie Sanders all oppose TTP but only because of the lost jobs effect, not the rest of the terms.  Some Republicans are sold on it, thinking that it is a good trade deal that would counter Chinese exports.  They should know that once TPP is in place, China can be admitted to TPP and we can do nothing to stop it.

Can it be stopped?  The Globalists’ proposals for merging countries into regional units that can then be merged into the United Nations are nothing new.    One such was during George Bush the younger’s term when the proposal was to merge Canada, America and Mexico into one regional government, the North American Union (NAU).  But a massive educational effort by the John Birch Society and their allies brought enough opposition to bear so that the NAU failed to materialize.   The globalist powers-that-be put it on the back burner and are subsequently pushing for other plans:  The Treaty of the Sea (global  control of the oceans),  the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP) (merging America into  the EU),  Trade in Services Agreement (adversely affecting our jobs in services), and the one up for passage right now, the TPP.

We can stop it again.   You may think that asking your legislators to oppose TTP is a wasted effort.  And, true, in some instances, it may not change their vote, but it would still have an impact.   Before legislation is brought up for a vote, the promoters take notice of how much opposition there is to it.   If it is sufficient, they will postpone the vote or come up with a different angle. 

This was the case in the 1970’s when the plan was to merge all the countries in the world directly into the United Nations (UN).  But, there was sufficient exposure of the UN, spearheaded by The John Birch Society, that it was necessary for the globalists to abandon that plan; and, as a result, we have been given all these years of freedom as an independent nation.  Plan B then became the formation of regional governments that can then be merged into the UN.  We now see that being implemented.

So, spread the word and ask others to do what you have done, which is to contact your Representative and two Senators in D.C. and urge them to vote NO to TPP. 
Sue Long for  the Committee for Constitutional Government, Post Office Box 972, Gloucester, VA  23061


Wednesday, October 14, 2015

Red Alert Red Alert Red Alert #14 TREASON

See below this post for URGENT ACTION ALERT

Strong Cities, Smarter Cities, and Smart Cities‏


The Transformation is Coming

Forget the NGOs, the UN is coming!

Strong Cities Network:

“The UN is coming and coming in the worst way possible for patriotic America!"

Forget the NGOs, the UN is coming!


Smarter Cities Challenge Summit 2012

IBM’s Smarter Cities Challenge St. Louis Report

Overall themes The long-term solution for public safety is to provide sufficient education, jobs and economic opportunity for all members of a community. As public safety is connected to virtually every City issue from housing and education to economic development and the social safety net, so all these systems must be aligned if we are to prevent crime rather than react to it. The City must renew its focus on using data to track, analyze and predict outcomes across the range of City systems."
After reading about Smarter Cities has crime in St. Louis improved since 2012?   

"As the majority of the world’s population becomes urban, cities must become centers of learning for young and old. Every person, organization and region needs to get smart – to skill up, learn more and build new capacities faster and cheaper than ever. In the long run, education is the economic development agenda. Innovative new tools and schools are making it possible for individuals, organizations, and cities to boost learning outcomes. Most begin with leadership and an innovation mindset. This combination of persistence, entrepreneurship and a collaborative focus on impact can be taught in every classroom and encouraged in every city. This book was created from a two year investigation project launched to discover the civic formula required to dramatically boost learning outcomes and employability....This book was made possible with a grant from Carnegie Corporation."

These are Portfolio Hubs SO FAR:

Getting Smart on Regional Next-Gen School Design



Charlotte named Louisiana Superintendent John White as taking Arne Duncan's position. It is ex-NY Commissioner John King Jr. that will be taking Duncan's place.

Call your Senators 202-224-3121 and DEMAND that, in light of the national controversy over education restructuring and reauthorization of ESEA,  John King, Jr., Obama's replacement for Secretary of Education, go before the Senate Education Committee for traditional confirmation hearings.

The Rise Of The Education Transformers


These people (well-meaning or not) are more dangerous than those on the left. Please read the latest post The Rise Of The Education Transformers and listen to my interview BEFORE you read this horribly misleading neoconservative/Trotskyite group letter to Congress opposing reauthorization of ESEA education legislation!!!!!!  No mention of school choice/charters without which globalist takeover cannot possibly be implemented!!!!

The neoconservatives are driving us into global TYRANNY!

REPEAT: This tyranny can not take place without tax-funded school choice and unelected council form of government. This is taxation without representation.

Note well this is the one issue that is not mentioned in the neoconservatives' group letter to Congress.

We intend for this to be the last post. Should something of major global significance occur, be sure to check back with the blog for urgent updates.

Marcus Tullius Cicero, (106-43 B.C.) Roman Statesman, Philosopher and Orator:

“A nation can survive its fools, and even the ambitious. But it cannot survive treason from within. An enemy at the gates is less formidable, for he is known and carries his banner openly. But the traitor moves amongst those within the gate freely, his sly whispers rustling through all the alleys, heard in the very halls of government itself. For the traitor appears not a traitor; he speaks in accents familiar to his victims, and he wears their face and their arguments, he appeals to the baseness that lies deep in the hearts of all men. He rots the soul of a nation, he works secretly and unknown in the night to undermine the pillars of the city, he infects the body politic so that it can no longer resist. A murderer is less to fear.”


Sunday, October 11, 2015

The Rise Of The Education Transformers

This post is the result of a joint effort by researchers and writers who have studied these issues over a period of 100 years.

What banner is raised to justify every change, every innovation, and every move to destroy true education and our Constitutional rights? It is the banner of ...


Who are the Transformers?

They are legion. They are all those government and private organizations, politicians, foundations, both left and right, who coalesce at the Radical Center to "change" America and our children. Under their battle cry of "Transformation" and "Continuous Learning" they will not leave America’s youth alone until they have all been turned into automatons of sustainability for the New World Global Order.

After many years of making inroads into our educational establishments, the transformers, including Communists, Socialists, and Trotskyites, continue on relentlessly. Note what Obama said, when commenting on the resignation of Arne Duncan, U. S. Secretary of Education: "Now keep in mind, none of this change has been easy. And we still have a long way to go. One of the things about education is that it doesn’t deliver results tomorrow or the next day. This is a decade-long or longer proposition. We plant seeds now; we make changes now, and we watch each successive class benefit from these reforms.

Just when you thought it couldn’t get worse, do Obama’s comments sound like the Transformers have only just begun? Then what is next?


Back in 2013, when the House passed the "Student Success Act" (the Reauthorization of the ESEA Act) Representative Steve Scalise of Louisiana let the cat out of the bag concerning the intent for the globalization plan of all education via Charters. He said: "The education reforms in New Orleans are recognized as a national model for public education transformation, and serve as prime examples of why states and local school systems are better suited to determine student achievement than the federal government. I’m proud to spearhead this amendment and support this bill which takes significant steps towards getting the federal government out of the classroom."

Not only is New Orleans the national model, it is the international model for Portfolio Charter Community Education.

So while some conservatives tout getting "government out of the classroom" the intent is to replace federal control with control at the state and local level through a two-pronged front – Charter schools and restructuring of State governments. The goal, both nationally and internationally, is the New Orleans Charter Community Education model which is now euphemistically called the "Portfolio" plan.

New Orleans now has all Charter Schools. But what New Orleans has is far more than just Charters. With the help of John Ayers, brother of radical leftist, Bill Ayers, Tulane University, The Cowan Institute, and others, including the Archdiocese of New Orleans, the New Orleans Community Charter Plan is the model for Community Schools to control the lives of all citizens. It has been announced that this plan is intended as the international model. If you doubt this, read:


The Red Left and the Blue Right

On the left, the major government players are Obama, Arne Duncan, Secretary of Education, who is now retiring, and his "acting" replacement, John King, Jr. They represent the tight federal control of education, and it was Duncan who orchestrated Common Core in the states. Now that Duncan is retiring, John King, Jr. of  New York State will be acting Secretary. His position while Commissioner of  Education of  New York was in favor of federal control of education. But here is the curious thing. Those on the left support Charter schools… Obama, Duncan, and King all support Charters/Choice. How could that be? Isn’t that what Conservatives support?

On the "right" we have those who are clamoring for decentralization of education, local control, and Choice/Charters. (Those individuals are representatives like Scalise, Sen. Lamar Alexander, Representative Kline, and others who pushed through the Student Success Act in the House and the Every Child Achieves Act in the Senate.) Actually, decentralization, enhanced by global "Networking" and data banks, allows for even tighter control of citizens.


"At forums across the state, teachers and parents expressed outrage at Dr. King, who was unwavering in his defense of the tests. After a forum near Poughkeepsie, where he was drowned out by the crowd, he canceled several other planned forums, then rescheduled them. This year the state teachers’ union called for his resignation."

The New York State Allies of Public Education labeled King as a Catastrophe for New York with blatant disregard for parent and teachers.

" 'King was a catastrophe as New York’s Education Commissioner.  Throughout his administration, his policies were on a constant collision course with parents, teachers and good sense...'  

'Throughout his term in New York, John King was notorious for his complete disconnect from parents, teachers, and school officials. His blatant disregard for concerned parents and educators fueled opt outs to historic numbers. Our only hope is that this bizarre move by the White House will have the same effect across the country, spreading the Opt Out movement to every corner of the nation...'  
'Former NYS Commissioner of Education John King helped create an educational disaster for New York and our children are still feeling the devastating effects,'   

'John King was relentless in pushing the inappropriate Common Core standards, flawed curriculum, defective exams, and an invalid teacher evaluation system on our schools, all of which caused more than 200,000 parents to opt out of the state exams last spring...' "


"King will serve in the new role on an acting basis for the remainder of Obama’s presidency, and he will not be a formal appointee which means he will not require Congressional approval, writes the Associated Press."

This is the most shocking end run around our constitutional representative form of government by the Obama administration. This appointment which is not requiring a traditional constitutional Senate education committee approval is the most outrageous to date. Apparently, Obama’s appointment of John King is a signal for an aggressive education agenda. King has already been put into action as described by Politico’s Morning education alert.

"POLITICO's Morning Education By Caitlin Emma | 10/08/2015 10:01 AM EDTWith help from Allie Grasgreen Ciaramella, Jennifer Haberkorn, Maggie Severns and Aubree Eliza Weaver
ESEA ACTION ON THE HILL (KIND OF): Outgoing Education Secretary Arne Duncan, secretary-in-waiting John King and Democratic Sens. Cory Booker, Chris Murphy and Elizabeth Warren will hold a roundtable today on the Hill to talk ESEA reauthorization. Students, teachers and civil rights leaders will join them for the event, which wasn't listed on Duncan's public schedule for the week. All three Democratic senators voted against [] the Senate's rewrite of the law earlier this summer because it wasn't strong enough on accountability. Duncan is expected to talk about the need for a new law (a refresher on his priorities here: that's aggressive on equity and cements ESEA's civil rights origins, with King moderating the discussion, which starts at 9:45 a.m. in 562 Dirksen."

How much influence will King have on the outcome of the ESEA Conference? Does it look like the bargaining is just beginning?

King will not be backing off Obama’s K-12 reforms, yet he is very involved in Charter Schools and was founder of a chain of Charter Schools. He also founded an organization that manages Charter Schools. As Commissioner of New York State public schools, he supervised the implementation of Common Core. How did he regard New York parents and teachers who did not want Common Core?

"To John King, anyone who questions or criticizes the state's top-down education "reform" agenda is an outsider who is not committed to seeing kids learn. Parents and educators who find flaws in sweeping curriculum and teacher evaluation changes are portrayed as lazy, excuse-making haters."


The Red and Blue merge into the Radical Purple Center

It is vital to note that King, Obama, and Duncan support Charters. Yet these officials also support strong Federal top-down control. Who else supports Charters? Heavily involved with the promotion of Choice/Charter schools are Republicans and so-called "conservative" institutions and organizations. Their slogan is "CHOICE." But how can one have freedom of choice while under the control of the Federal government, and then be slotted into diverse Charter schools where one’s career path is formulated by grade 8? Isn’t the attempt to unite freedom of education with government-control an oxymoron?

Not if you belong to the RADICAL CENTER where the left and right meet and coalesce. That is exactly what we are seeing here. The coalescing of the left and the right appear to have the capacity to control everyone, locally and globally through Community Education. Some don’t even realize in what they are participating, and their motives may be different, but the results of their efforts are the same. If the radical New Orleans model succeeds, everyone, including homeschoolers, will be under the control of "Community Education".  Regionalism = Communism. 

As an example, Lamar Alexander, sponsor of the Every Child Achieves Act (Reauthorization of the ESEA Act), purportedly supports "state and local control" over federal control. Yet his bill incorporates the mandated Marxist "Universal Design for Education". In addition, it is hoped that The Student Success Act will be amended in conference to include " Portability". If Portability funding is approved in the conference for the passage of the Reauthorization of ESEA, it will impose top-down standards which follow the student into the school of their choice. Therefore, the school is forced to adhere to all federal and/or state mandates. State Departments of Education are now simply clones of the U. S. Dept. of Education, so the U. S. Dept. could actually "wither away" or be discarded and nothing would change. The plan has been to move the control apparatus (data, assessment, et al.) to the state level, if it is not already there. Perhaps the states just need a little "tweaking" from Marc Tucker’s restructuring plan for a smooth transfer of control.

How does one have state and local control while being controlled by Federal/State money and also by established globally U.N. controlled Common Core Standards (Agenda 2030)? Welcome to Communist America‏. Duncan has come under heavy criticism for his oppressive federal control policies. Lamar Alexander’s bill in the Senate, along with Kline’s bill in the, claim to hold out the hope for less federal control and more state, and local control, along with Charter/Choice.


But…not so fast.  Looming on the horizon are the "evil twins"… Portfolio Community Education Plans and the restructuring of State Departments of Education, which sets up state control over all schools, while abolishing local school boards and taxpayer representation (right to vote). This would apparently be the combination of Charter Schools with tight top-down control. A perfect scenario for work-force training.

Marc Tucker is presenting the idea of "state" and "local control" by restructuring State Departments of Education. In other words, Tucker advocates transferring all federal control to the states. Utah was Tucker's recent target, where he and Tom Vander Ark shared top billing at an education conference aimed at Utah’s Department of Education. Tom Vander Ark, of Smart Cities and former Executive Director of the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, is promoting Portfolio Schools, which are Community Charter Schools, to complete the transformation Lousiana Representative Scalise talked about. Apparently Vander Ark works closely with the Center for Reinventing Public Education (CRPE) which presents Portfolio Schools as their model. Action Alert: Is Green The New Red?  New Orleans is the CRPE’s glowing exemplar for Portfolio schools, which again, according to Scalise, is the model to transform education. Some of the same colossal foundations bankrolling CRPE were represented at the March, 2015 Carnegie’s "Summit" Conference to transform education.

Here are the funders for CRPE:  The Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, Carnegie Corporation of New York, Fund for Educational Excellence, The Joyce Foundation, Laura and John Arnold Foundation, Michael and Susan Dell Foundation, National Alliance for Public Charter Schools, Nellie Mae Education Foundation, US Department of Education, Walton Family Foundation.  For the rest of the donor list go here:


With the assistance of Tony Byrk’s Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching and Learning goals and "tools" we, in the community, are to all transform. Don’t forget it was Tony Byrk and his foundation that was so instrumental in putting Common Core in Catholic Schools.

On March 22-24, 2016 the Carnegie Foundation Summit on Improvement in Education will convene yet again to present innovative thinkers and dedicated practitioners to offer the community the opportunity to gather and work together to transform teaching and learning. You can learn more about this socialistic organization’s programs goals and "tools" here: 

In addition, the Carnegie Foundation of New York, along with the Walton Foundation, sponsored a seminar in Denver, Colorado for education leaders across the country.  The purpose was to present the Portfolio approach for schools.  Paul Hill of the Center for Reinvention Public Education (CRPE) was one of the featured presenters. One of the statements describing this event was:

"Grant makers will also explore two critical elements of the portfolio strategy – attracting and retaining smart, compassionate, motivated, and creative talent, and working with local communities to build support for a diverse portfolio of schools."

By now we should understand that the term "diverse schools" means Charter Human Capital work-force training centers. If CRPE, the CEE-Trust (Center for Excellence in Education), and their associates see their plans materialize, federal money will go directly to the local schools, themselves, and the school management will use the money "as they see fit" (under top down state and local control.) Isn’t that a euphemism for diverse schools, and isn’t this just another form of "Portability"?  With Portfolio Schools there are no locally elected school boards. A CEE-Trust reorganization plan says the local schools would operate under the direction of the "Community School Office", which is under the authority of the Commissioner of the State Department of Education. CEE-Trust also says there would be a few schools for more advanced students, so that must mean the rest of the schools would be for dumbed-down "worker" students. Isn’t it enlightening to learn that Obama, Duncan, and King all have sent their children to elite private schools? The private school King selected for his children has no Common CoreWill some private schools or Charters be allowed to exist without a draconian dumbed-down, work-force training agenda to ensure a real education for children of the elite?

Do you think that the Marxist Universal Design for Learning, the mind-controlling Outcome Based Education, the Mental Health applications, and the Socialist U.N. socialization of the student will go away in Charter Portfolio Schools? These techniques are already embedded in Common Core.

Do you think that Common Core will go away with diverse Portfolio (Charter) schools? Vander Ark, King, Tucker, and the money and power behind them, including Gates, politicians, foundations, and the U. S. Department of Education, all support Common Core. But wait… these must be the liberal people and groups, right? Won’t the conservative organizations save us from all this?

Not at all!

Don't all conservative "privatizer" "organizations" like Koch, Heritage Foundation, Heartland, Pioneer, Americans for Prosperity, Eagle Forum, American Principles Project,What is Common Core, Home School Legal Defense Association, etc., support Charters? Former Republican Governor, Jeb Bush,  inundated Florida with Charters. Is Republican Governor  Bobby Jindal fighting Charters of "Ground Zero" New Orleans, Louisiana and the rest of the state? Some or perhaps many smaller grassroots conservative organizations also support Charters. Those who wish for "free market" Charter schools are dreaming. For Charter buffs who think they can have their freedom without control...dream on. For Charter Schools with "waivers", do you think such privileges will be permanent as the screws of Agenda 2030 and Community Education tighten?  People and organizations supporting Charters have become, either wittingly or unwittingly, innocently or willingly, part of the Radical Center to transform our children from free and God-fearing citizens into robots, and to transform our country into a One World Marxist Global Village of slavery. Why? Follow the money, the power, and the privileges. The result of the education clash between left and right is nothing more than part of a dialectic game to destroy America and all traces of God. For those conservatives who have no idea what they are aiding and abetting, and for all the rest of us, NOW IS THE TIME TO WAKE UP before our children and our country are decimated by the Transformers.

The biggest transformers of all are the United Nations, UNESCO, ECOSOC, NGOs, and the rest of the staggering list of U. N. agencies. The U. N., with it's web-like global networking and worldwide satellite organizations, hopes to bring America into a Godless One World Order, where Agenda 2030 and Sustainability will make slaves of all except the elite.




Related Links:


The Greatest Christmas Present to America 2014


Action Alert: Is Green The New Red?



Anita Hoge -- Bill: HR-5 Denies Parents Their Rights Over Their Own ...


Welcome to Communist America

Fifty Years Of Tax-Funded Poisonous Education Lies

Doublespeak: ESEA Update # 1

Update On S1177 Conference



ABCs of DumbDown: The Deliberate Dumbing Down of the Village

ABCs of DumbDown: "Birds of a Feather Flock Together"

ABCs of DumbDown: "Community Education"

ABCs of DumbDown: Community Education & UN Agenda 21

The Myth of "Local Control"



Common Core Charter Village Hub Schools

21st Century Schools

The School of the Hub







U.S.-Soviet Merger requires Char­ter Schools For A One World Global Planned Economy


Action Alert: Satanic Influences In Education By N...